The Downtown Plan; what hasn’t been said aloud.
Just over a year ago, the City of El Paso unveiled another in a long line of plans to redevelop Downtown. We hope by now that we do not have to explain this plan to you nor the controversy that has surrounded it.
The biggest source of the Plan’s controversy seems to be what it holds in store for the part of El Paso known as Segundo Barrio. Additionally, the Plan has brought up the possibility of using eminent domain, as many people who live or run businesses in the planned redevelopment area simply do not want to give up their property.
Before I get whether or not I support the plan, I feel that I should express my disgust with how the plan came about. Having studied public administration, I believe that any “plans” should be done from the bottom up, meaning that those who will be affected the most by a plan, be they rich or poor, should be consulted first. I have not heard much of this being the case. In fact, I have heard quite the opposite more often than not.
At some point, the City held planning sessions that were open to the public in an attempt to make up for taking none to little public input. The City may not have understood, though, that a population in poverty, as most Segundo Barrio residents are, can not be dealt with the same way an average middle-class citizen can be dealt with. The City Council Representative for that area, who supports the Plan and has a conflict of interest with the plan, also made a few attempts to talk to residents of the area and gain their support for the Plan.
Deciding on this plan can be a question of whether the ends justify the means. This plan, in my opinion, was not planned properly. I have trouble believing that the same methods would have been employed in the planning process had the affected residents been of a higher socioeconomic status. That said, it is difficult for me to support the Plan. Residents and business owners must feel like someone cheated on by their spouse. From what I have seen, the City, the cheater in this metaphor, has thought that sending a bouquet of flowers would get them out of the doghouse. Aside from the few public hearings mentioned above, the City has not made much effort to bridge the divison created by the Plan.
As time has passed, the supporters and opponents of the Plan have seemingly only grown farther apart. This apparent lack of collaboration makes it even more difficult for me to root for this Plan. If it does not go through, I hope that the City learns that redevelopment starts by collaborating with those who will be most affected by redevelopment. If it does go through, I hope that affected residents are taken care of.
I have more sympathy for residents of the affected area than I do for the people who run businesses in the area. A business is a business, and by starting one you are taking a risk. I also agree that blight exists in Downtown, primarily because of several businesses there that seem to cater to residents of Juarez. I figure that blight cannot be good for property values and thus property taxes. The Plan would likely fix that, driving up property values Downtown and hopefully easing the tax burden on residents.
Finally, there has been several misinformation regarding the plan, which I will not get into. I can say, however, that private interests are on both sides and somebody is getting screwed.
As I mentioned before, I cannot really support the Plan. I can only hope that the outcome has as few casualties as possible.
-djquinones
2 Comments, Comment or Ping
gabem
Nice rant. The way I’m seeing it now, after so much talk, let’s get something going already. Just like city council to drag things on forever, then to have nothing come of it. I agree they (Planners) did things very wrong from the get go, but if they can guarantee a better living situation for some of these folks living in dilapidated places, I’m for it.
Yes, they (the residents) will say they don’t need anything, and they want to be left alone. But, do we always know what’s right for us? No. In this situation, is the community (the city) more important than the residents of this area? Maybe. I for one want this city to just keep looking towards the future. The reason plenty graduate from college and leave is not for the salary, it is for the livelihood incentives.
The places to visit, the tourist attractions, the city culture, the arts (Endi knows this), the things to see. We’ve already lost many attractions due to closed minded city council members of the past. It’s time for the youth movement to have a greater voice, and have things done for them NOW that they will cherish in 20 years or so. This includes a fantastic Downtown El Paso. Build off of that, and the possibilities are endless.
The bickering is too damn annoying, city council get your asses in gear, or get out of the damn way! Stop being afraid of CHANGE, stop being afraid to make a long lasting impression on El Paso.
Apr 9th, 2007
chesswithdeath
This has nothing to do with redevelopment, but it has everything to do with redevelopment.
Boycott Chama Lounge.
El Paso already got $25 million through the Empowerment Zone for redevelopment. They threw some street festivals overpaid themselves and gave nudge-nudge-wink-wink loans to family members.
BOYCOTT CHAMA LOUNGE
Apr 11th, 2007
Reply to “The Downtown Plan; what hasn’t been said aloud.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.